How to Start an AgTech Startup Without VC (2026)

Short answer: To start an agtech startup without VC, build narrow software for people who already farm (growers, ranchers, agronomists, co-ops and ag retailers), charge from the first customer, and sell around the crop calendar. Farmers already buy simple tools on simple plans: CattleMax starts at $30 a month billed yearly and Harvest Profit at $1,600 a year. Leave sensors, robots, drones, ag lending and produce marketplaces until revenue, not investors, can pay for the inventory, field trials and liquidity they need.

Agtech has a reputation as a venture category, and the companies that make headlines usually are venture-backed: autonomous tractors, vertical farms, drone fleets, biologicals, carbon marketplaces. Their economics share a pattern. They build physical things, run long field trials, or need two sides of a market before either side gets value. But most of agriculture runs on paper notebooks, spreadsheets, text messages, a dealer's portal and an accountant who visits once a year. That is a software market, and it can be served the way any vertical SaaS without VC is served: one painful workflow, one type of operation, one region.

This guide covers what farms look like as customers, a wedge table, software vs hardware vs marketplace, a step-by-step plan, how to sell to farmers, a US and UK regulation and data checklist from official pages, integrations, pricing models with verified examples, funding without VC, and real companies with their honest funding status. Every number, rule and quote below was checked on its source page on 13 Nov 2026. The advice between them is ours and is marked as such.

TL;DR#

• Sell software to people who farm. Farmbrite plans start at $29 a month or $290 a year (Farmbrite pricing), CattleMax at $30 a month billed yearly (CattleMax pricing), Bushel Farm at $75 a year (Bushel pricing).
• Bootstrapped farm software exists. Farmbrite says it is "completely self-funded and runs solely on its own profits" (Farmbrite about). CattleMax says it has no outside investors and 100% of its revenue comes from customer subscriptions (CattleMax about).
• Sell on the crop calendar. Off-season is for demos and onboarding; planting and harvest are for being useful and staying out of the way.
• Records rules create budgets. US restricted use pesticide records must be made "within 14 days" and kept "for a period of 2 years" (7 CFR 110.3). HSE says UK professional users must keep pesticide records "for at least 3 years" (HSE).
• Plumbing exists. John Deere, Climate FieldView, Leaf and AgGateway's ADAPT all give third-party developers a route into farm data.

Disclosure: ZeroRaised publishes this guide and runs a launch site for bootstrapped products. ZeroRaised has no commercial relationship with any company named here, and no links in this post are affiliate links. This is general information, not legal, tax or regulatory advice. Food safety, pesticide and labour rules depend on exactly what your customer grows and where, so check with the regulator or a qualified adviser before you build a product that claims to make someone compliant.

Why agtech looks like a VC-only game (and when it is not)#

The agtech companies most founders can name raised large rounds because their products are expensive to build before anyone pays. A robot needs prototypes, field testing across several seasons and a service network. A sensor company carries inventory, warranty claims and installation. A vertical farm needs a building, lights and energy. A produce marketplace is useless to buyers until growers list, and useless to growers until buyers show up. Ag lending needs a balance sheet.

The second reason is the season. A crop cycle gives you one real test a year for many products. If your product only proves itself at harvest, you get one data point per year per customer, and that is a slow way to iterate on savings.

Software for farm operations escapes most of this. It does not need to prove a yield gain; it needs to save someone time on a job they already do, or keep a record they already have to keep. That value shows up in the first week, not at harvest.

The market is large and consolidating. USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service estimates "the number of farms in the United States for 2025 is estimated at 1,865,000, down 15,000 farms from 2024," with average farm size of 469 acres, up from 466 (USDA NASS, Farms and Land in Farms 2025 Summary). USDA's Economic Research Service forecasts net farm income "at $158.4 billion for calendar year 2026," down 2.6% from 2025 in nominal terms (USDA ERS).

Our read: fewer, larger farms is good news for a software seller. A bigger operation has more employees, more fields, more records and more reason to pay for a tool, and still usually buys like a small business: one or two decision makers, a card or a cheque, and no procurement department.

Who you can sell to#

"Farmers" is too broad to be a customer. Agriculture is a long chain of different businesses with different budgets:

• Row-crop growers (corn, soy, wheat, cotton): large acreage, heavy equipment, data already flowing into equipment clouds, grain marketing decisions.
• Specialty crop growers (fruit, vegetables, nuts, vines): labour-heavy, food safety and traceability obligations, buyer audits, packing.
• Livestock operations (cattle, sheep, dairy, pigs, poultry): animal records, health treatments, breeding, movement records, assurance schemes.
• Greenhouse and indoor growers: climate control, crop scheduling, labour, a factory-like operation.
• Small and direct-to-consumer farms: farm shops, CSAs, farmers markets, online ordering and delivery.
• Agronomists and crop consultants: scouting, recommendations, many clients per adviser.
• Ag retailers, dealers and co-ops: sell inputs and equipment, deliver agronomy services, handle grain.
• Food processors and packers: receive product from many farms, need traceability and supplier records.

Each has a different buyer, a different budget and a different season. Pick one.

The wedge table#

These are workflows where a bootstrapped founder can sell a narrow tool. The table is our editorial view of the market; the regulations and prices it mentions are covered with sources in the sections below.

Our read: the best rows have three things in common. The buyer already spends money or hours on the job, the job repeats every season, and a wrong record costs something real (an audit failure, a missed contract, a sick animal). Spray records, livestock records and traceability score well on all three.

Carbon and sustainability reporting is another possible wedge, especially for food companies asking farms for data. We cover that in our climate tech startup guide, so we will not repeat it here.

Software vs hardware vs marketplace#

The single biggest decision is the shape of the business. This comparison is our editorial view.

Ag lending and fintech (input financing, equipment loans, crop insurance tools) is a fourth shape that usually needs a balance sheet or a regulated partner. We would not start there without capital.

Our read: if you have a hardware idea, start with the software layer that would sit on top of it. An irrigation dashboard that reads the soil moisture probes a farm already owns teaches you what growers do with the data, earns revenue, and tells you whether your own probe would be worth building.

Step-by-step: how to start an agtech startup without VC#

1. Pick one operation type, one crop or species, one region#

"Farm management software" is not a wedge. "Calving records for 100 to 500 cow cow-calf operations in the US Plains" is. Region matters because crops, seasons, rules, dealers and co-ops differ. A spray log for UK arable growers and one for California almond growers are different products.

2. Get close to real farms before you build#

Spend a season (or at least a few weeks in a busy period) watching how the work is done. Ride along with an agronomist, sit in the farm office, stand in the packing shed. Run structured interviews about the last time something went wrong; our guide to customer discovery interviews covers how to ask about past behaviour instead of opinions.

Things to write down:

• What record or task they hate most, and when it happens.
• Who fills it in (often not the owner) and on what device.
• Who checks it: an auditor, a buyer, an agronomist, the bank, the accountant.
• What they use now and what it costs, including the agronomist's or bookkeeper's time.

3. Find the job that already has a budget#

The easiest sale replaces something the farm already pays for or is already required to do. Pesticide records, food safety audits, assurance schemes, buyer requirements and accountant-ready numbers all have deadlines and consequences. A dashboard that is merely interesting does not.

4. Build the smallest useful tool, mobile-first and offline-first#

The person entering data is often in a field, a barn or a tractor cab. Build for a phone, with big buttons, few required fields, and offline capture that syncs later. Export to PDF and CSV from day one, because the farm's auditor, accountant or agronomist will ask for it.

5. Charge from the first customer#

Farmers are used to paying for things that work and suspicious of things that are free. Pick a simple plan (per farm, per year) and charge it to your first users, even at a founder discount. If a buyer wants proof first, run a short paid trial with agreed success criteria; our guide to running a paid pilot for B2B SaaS has a template. For larger buyers such as co-ops, packers and ag retailers, a paid pilot across a handful of their farms is often the natural first contract.

6. Onboard before the season, support during it#

Time onboarding for the quiet months so the farm has the tool set up before it matters. During the busy season, answer the phone, fix bugs fast and do not ship big changes.

7. Add one integration that removes double entry#

Once you have users, add the integration they ask for most: field boundaries from an equipment cloud, a sync to their accounting software, or an export in the format their buyer or auditor wants. More on this below.

8. Grow through people farmers already trust#

Agronomists, dealers, co-ops, consultants, accountants who specialise in farming, breed associations and farmer groups. One trusted adviser using your tool with twenty clients beats twenty cold calls.

9. Expand along the same farm, then to the next region#

Once one workflow works, add the next job for the same customer (spray records lead to field records; livestock records lead to treatments and sales). Expand to a new region only when you understand its season and rules.

Selling to farmers#

Seasonality and the crop calendar#

Every operation has a calendar: planting, spraying, harvest, calving, lambing, packing. The busy months are the worst time to demo and the best time to be useful. Our read: map your target's calendar before you plan any launch or campaign. For many row-crop farms in the northern hemisphere, winter is meeting, planning and buying season. For specialty growers, the quiet period sits between harvest and pruning. For livestock, avoid calving and lambing weeks.

This also shapes cash flow. Annual plans paid in the off-season are common in farm software (Harvest Profit, Croptracker and Bushel Farm all list annual prices, see the pricing section), and they suit a bootstrapped company: cash comes in before the season, and churn decisions happen once a year.

Who decides#

On a family farm, the decision often sits with the owner, frequently with a spouse or family member who runs the books. On larger operations, a farm manager, an office manager or a specialist (a herd manager, a head grower, a food safety lead) may be the user while the owner signs. The agronomist or consultant who advises the farm can be the strongest influence of all.

Our read: identify the user, the payer and the adviser on every deal. If the adviser is sceptical, the deal stalls.

Trust is the whole game#

Farmers have been sold a lot of software that did not last. Trust comes from:

• Showing up in person, or through people who do.
• Clear data terms: who owns the farm's data, who can see it, and what happens if they leave. The industry has published standards for this (see the checklist below).
• Staying power: annual plans, visible support and a phone number.
• References from farms that look like theirs, in their region.

Channels: agronomists, dealers, co-ops and extension#

• Agronomists and crop consultants carry many farms each. A scouting or recommendation tool that saves them time can spread to their clients.
• Equipment dealers and ag retailers already sell technology and run service desks. Some resell or recommend software.
• Co-ops, packers and processors collect records from member or supplier farms and can sponsor a tool for all of them.
• Extension services and universities run field days, training and on-farm research. They do not sell products, but they are where growers learn.
• Farmer groups, breed associations and trade shows are the places where word of mouth starts.
• Farm accountants and lenders see every farm's numbers and know who is struggling with records.

Figured's pricing page notes that subscribing through a Figured partner costs less per month than subscribing directly (Figured pricing), a good example of a farm software company building an adviser channel into its price list.

Offline-first mobile and rural connectivity#

Assume no signal in the field, the barn or the packing shed. Our read: build offline capture, queue writes, sync when connected, show sync status clearly, and keep the app small. Test on an older phone with a cracked screen and gloves.

Regulation and data checklist (US and UK)#

Software vendors are rarely regulated directly, but your customers' record-keeping duties are often the reason they pay you. Everything below was checked on the official page on 13 Nov 2026. It is a starting list, not legal advice; rules vary by state, nation and crop, and change.

United States#

• FDA Food Traceability Rule (FSMA 204). Covered firms must keep records of Key Data Elements (KDEs) tied to Critical Tracking Events (CTEs) such as harvesting, cooling, initial packing, shipping, receiving and transformation, keep a traceability plan, and make records available to FDA within 24 hours of a request, with an electronic sortable spreadsheet in some cases. On compliance timing, FDA's page says it proposed extending the compliance date to 20 July 2028 and that Congress "directed FDA not to enforce the Food Traceability Rule prior to that same date," which FDA "intends to comply with" (FDA). Exemptions are in § 1.1305 of the rule.
• Food Traceability List. The rule applies to listed foods, including fresh leafy greens, fresh tomatoes, fresh peppers, fresh cucumbers, fresh herbs, fresh melons, shell eggs, fresh sprouts and several seafood and cheese categories (FDA Food Traceability List). If your wedge is produce traceability, check your customer's crops against the list.
• Restricted use pesticide records. Under 7 CFR 110.3, the record must be made "within 14 days following the pesticide application" and "retained for a period of 2 years," and must include the brand or product name and EPA registration number, the total amount applied, the location and size of area treated and the crop, the date, and the name and certification number (if applicable) of the certified applicator (7 CFR 110.3). States can add their own rules.
• Farm data principles. Ag Data Transparent says it developed the Privacy and Security Principles for Farm Data (2014). Companies complete an 11-question data use certification covering ownership, use, portability and security; "these answers are reviewed by an independent third party administrator," and "if approved, the Ag Data Transparent seal is issued" (Ag Data Transparent). Our read: even if you do not apply for the seal, answer those questions plainly in your terms.

United Kingdom#

• Pesticide records. HSE says: "By law, all professional users must keep records for at least 3 years of all the pesticides applications they undertake" (HSE). Northern Ireland and Scotland have their own guidance, so check DAERA or the Scottish Government if you sell there.
• Red Tractor. Red Tractor says food with its logo is "produced to strict rules of hygiene, food safety, and animal welfare," and publishes farm standards for sectors including beef and lamb, chicken, crops and sugar beet, dairy, fresh produce and pigs, with "around 300 independent assessors" carrying out "more than 60,000 checks per year" (Red Tractor). Assurance audits are a natural reason to keep digital records.
• Sustainable Farming Incentive. GOV.UK says the second application window for SFI 2026 opened on 22 September 2026 with a GBP 233 million fund, and that "every eligible farmer and land manager with at least three hectares of agricultural land can now apply" (GOV.UK). Scheme rules are in the SFI26 scheme rules and guidance. Our read: scheme applications and evidence create record-keeping work, but be careful about promising a farm it will qualify.

For your own product#

• Write a plain-language data policy: who owns the farm's data, what you use it for, whether you sell or share it, and how a farm exports and deletes it.
• Do not claim "FSMA compliant" or "Red Tractor approved" unless the regulator or scheme has said so. Say what records the tool helps keep.
• If you process personal data of workers (crew scheduling, payroll), UK GDPR and US state privacy laws may apply.
• If you touch payroll or visas (for example US H-2A paperwork), get specialist advice before you build.

This checklist is not legal advice.

Integrations#

Farm data is spread across equipment clouds, agronomy platforms, accounting software and spreadsheets. Removing double entry is often the product.

• John Deere Operations Center. Deere runs a developer portal, Develop with Deere. Leaf's integration guide describes the route: create an application under My Applications on developer.deere.com, select the APIs you need (for example Organizations and Webhook, or Clients, Farm, Field and Boundaries for field data), and expect that John Deere "may take some time to approve API access." Growers then authorize your app and choose which organizations to share (Leaf docs: connect John Deere).
• Climate FieldView (Bayer). The FieldView developer FAQ says becoming a platform partner is a three-step process (tell Climate about your business, agree partner terms, build and deploy), that "you do not have to pay to get a developer account on the platform," and that "Climate does not allow making API calls from a browser," so calls must come from your backend (FieldView developer FAQ).
• Leaf Agriculture. Leaf calls itself "the AI-native API for farm data," providing "clean, standardized, and aggregated farm data from all major agricultural sources," and names John Deere, CNHi, Climate FieldView and Trimble among its providers (Leaf docs). Our read: an aggregator can save months if you need many equipment brands; check its pricing with sales, as we could not load its pricing page today.
• ADAPT (AgGateway). ADAPT, the Ag Data Application Programming Toolkit, is made up of an Agricultural Application Data Model, a common API and open source and proprietary data conversion plugins. Its site says the open source licence "allows you to include the framework in your software and change it as you need," and lists plugins including ISO and GeoJSON (prototype) (ADAPT framework).
• Accounting: Xero and QuickBooks Online. Many farms keep the books in one of these, often through an accountant. Figured, a farm finance tool, says it "connects to Xero or QuickBooks Online" rather than being standalone accounting (Figured pricing). We could not load Xero's or Intuit's developer pages today, so check their current partner terms yourself.
• Breed associations, buyers and assurance schemes. CattleMax's Registered plan lists "breed association interfaces" (CattleMax pricing), and Harvest Profit's Standard plan lists a John Deere Operations Center integration (Harvest Profit pricing). Those are the integrations farmers notice.

Our read: pick the one integration your first ten customers cannot work without, and build CSV import and export for everything else. Equipment cloud APIs take approval time, so apply early.

Pricing models with real examples#

Farm software prices are mostly simple and annual. All prices below are from official pricing pages on 13 Nov 2026, in USD unless stated.

What the table shows, in our read:

• Per farm flat pricing (Farmbrite, Tend, Bushel Farm, Harvest Profit) is the easiest to sell and to understand. Tier by something that grows with the farm: users, animals, fields.
• Per head (AgriWebb) and per field (Figured) pricing tracks value for larger operations but needs a calculator and a conversation.
• Annual plans match farm cash flow. Price them for the off-season buying window.
• Service tiers (Harvest Profit's Hands On, setup packages like those on AgriWebb's Australian pricing page, from $200) are a good bootstrapped revenue line and a way to learn.
• Per acre pricing is common in agronomy services; we did not find a per-acre list price on the pages we checked today, so we have not quoted one.

A worked example (illustrative)#

Suppose you build spray records for specialty growers and charge $600 a year per farm, close to Bushel Farm's Essentials price. This is illustrative arithmetic, not a forecast:

• 50 farms x $600 = $30,000 a year.
• 150 farms x $600 = $90,000 a year.
• Add a $300 one-off setup for half of them and year one gains $22,500 on 150 farms.

Our read: fifty farms is a sensible first goal for a founder who sells in person in one region. It will not pay a team, but it proves the wedge and funds the next step.

Funding without VC#

Software for farms is cheap to start. What costs money is time in the field. Ways to pay for it:

• Customer revenue first. Annual plans in the off-season give you a year of runway per customer. Ask for the year up front at a founder discount.
• Paid pilots with co-ops, packers, processors and ag retailers. They have budgets and a reason to standardise their suppliers' records.
• Services. Setup, data migration, record audits and consulting. Ag Connections' co-founder told AgFunderNews: "We funded our software development though revenue from our consulting work" (AgFunderNews).
• USDA SBIR/STTR. USDA NIFA's SBIR/STTR program awards grants to small businesses in 10 broad topic areas and says to sign up for Grants.gov alerts using "10.212" in the CFDA field to hear about new notices (USDA NIFA SBIR/STTR). NIFA's FY 2025 Phase I funding page lists an award range of $125,000 to $181,500 (NIFA Phase I); check the current notice for this year's figures and deadline.
• Other grants and state programs. Our list of startup grants for bootstrapped founders covers more options; many states and regions have agricultural innovation grants too.
• Bank lines and personal savings. Ag Connections' founders, per the same article, used personal assets and a consulting contract as collateral for a bank line of credit.

Our read: grants are useful for the research-heavy part of a product, but they are slow and come with reporting. Do not wait for one before selling.

Real examples and their funding status#

We include only companies whose funding status we could check on a primary or named source today.

• Farmbrite. Founded in 2012 by Ian and Janine Russell, who built it for their own farm in Colorado. Its about page says it is "completely self-funded and runs solely on its own profits" (Farmbrite about). Plans start at $29 a month (Farmbrite pricing).
• CattleMax. Built in 1999 on a working cow-calf operation in Central Texas. Its about page says it is "independently owned by a ranching family," with no outside investors and 100% of its revenue from customer subscriptions (CattleMax about). Plans start at $30 a month billed yearly (CattleMax pricing).
• Ag Connections. Launched in 1998, funded its software development through consulting revenue, and was acquired by Syngenta in October 2015, per a 2016 interview with co-founder Rick Murdock (AgFunderNews).
• Harvest Profit. Founded in 2015 in Fargo, North Dakota, and acquired by John Deere, per coverage dated 13 November 2020: "John Deere has acquired Harvest Profit, a leading provider of farm profitability software based in Fargo, North Dakota," with the software continuing through John Deere Operations Center (Spudman). Its founder, Nick Horob, appeared on a Future of Agriculture podcast episode titled "Bootstrapping a Farm Management Software Company"; we could not load the episode itself today, so we do not quote its details or treat its funding history as verified. Its Standard plan is $1,600 a year today (Harvest Profit pricing).

Our read: the first three share a pattern. Each started close to farms (founders who farmed or ranched, or a consulting business), solved one workflow and grew on subscriptions or services rather than investor money. Ag Connections and Harvest Profit were both bought by larger ag companies, a reminder that a focused farm software business can end in a sale as well as in years of profit.

Mistakes to avoid#

• Building a platform before a tool. "All-in-one farm management" is a crowded market; start with one record.
• Selling at harvest. Nobody has time; you will burn goodwill.
• Ignoring the adviser. The agronomist, accountant or co-op can block or carry the deal.
• Online-only apps. If it fails without signal, it fails.
• Vague data terms. Farmers ask who owns their data. Have the answer in writing.
• Promising compliance. Help keep the records; do not claim approval you do not have.
• Hardware creep. Use sensors farms already own before you design your own.

Frequently asked questions#

Can you start an agtech startup without VC?#

Yes, if you build software for people who already farm instead of hardware or a marketplace. Narrow tools for growers, ranchers, agronomists and ag retailers (livestock records, spray logs, grain marketing, crew scheduling, traceability records, farm shop ordering) can be sold from the first customer on a monthly or annual plan. Farmbrite says it is completely self-funded and runs solely on its own profits, and CattleMax says it has no outside investors and is paid for entirely by customer subscriptions. Robotics, sensors, drones, ag lending and produce marketplaces usually need outside capital because they carry inventory, credit risk or a cold start.

What is the best agtech niche for a bootstrapped founder?#

Our read: a records or workflow problem for one crop or livestock type, in one region, where the buyer already pays for something worse. Good candidates are spray and application records, livestock records for one species, grain contract tracking, seasonal crew scheduling, traceability records for produce growers and packers, equipment maintenance logs, and ordering software for farm shops and CSAs. Avoid anything that needs custom hardware or two-sided liquidity before it works.

How do you sell software to farmers?#

Sell around the crop calendar, not your own quarter. Demo and onboard in the off-season, stay out of the way at planting and harvest, and be useful during them. Find out who decides (often the owner and a spouse, a farm manager, or the agronomist who advises them), earn trust through people farmers already listen to (agronomists, dealers, co-ops, extension services, farmer groups), and build mobile apps that work offline because rural connectivity is patchy in fields and barns.

What regulations affect farm software in the US and UK?#

Software vendors are rarely regulated directly, but their customers' record rules shape the product. In the US, restricted use pesticide applications must be recorded within 14 days and kept for 2 years under 7 CFR 110.3, and the FDA Food Traceability Rule requires key data elements for critical tracking events on Food Traceability List foods, though FDA says Congress directed it not to enforce the rule before 20 July 2028. In the UK, HSE says professional users must keep pesticide records for at least 3 years, Red Tractor sets farm assurance standards, and Defra runs the Sustainable Farming Incentive. This is not legal advice.

Which integrations does a farm software startup need?#

It depends on the buyer. Row-crop growers expect data from John Deere Operations Center, Climate FieldView and other equipment clouds; Leaf's API aggregates John Deere, CNHi, Climate FieldView, Trimble and more. The open source ADAPT toolkit from AgGateway converts between equipment data formats. Most farms also want their numbers in Xero or QuickBooks Online; Figured, for example, says it connects to either. Pick the one integration your first ten customers cannot work without.

Launch your farm software#

ZeroRaised is a launch directory for products built without institutional VC. When your first farms are using the tool, run through our product launch checklist for bootstrapped makers, time the launch for the off-season, and submit your product for free. For more guides on building without investors, join the ZeroRaised newsletter.

Sources#

All last checked 13 Nov 2026.

• USDA NASS, Farms and Land in Farms 2025 Summary, last checked 13 Nov 2026
• USDA ERS, Highlights from the Farm Income Forecast, last checked 13 Nov 2026
• FDA, FSMA Final Rule on Requirements for Additional Traceability Records, last checked 13 Nov 2026
• FDA, Food Traceability List, last checked 13 Nov 2026
• 7 CFR 110.3, Recordkeeping requirements (restricted use pesticides), last checked 13 Nov 2026
• Ag Data Transparent, last checked 13 Nov 2026
• HSE, FAQ: concerns about the use of pesticides, last checked 13 Nov 2026
• Red Tractor, last checked 13 Nov 2026
• GOV.UK, GBP 233 million fund (SFI 2026 window 2), last checked 13 Nov 2026
• GOV.UK, SFI26 scheme rules and guidance, last checked 13 Nov 2026
• Develop with Deere, last checked 13 Nov 2026
• Leaf docs: connect John Deere, last checked 13 Nov 2026
• Leaf docs, last checked 13 Nov 2026
• Climate FieldView developer FAQ, last checked 13 Nov 2026
• ADAPT framework, last checked 13 Nov 2026
• USDA NIFA SBIR/STTR, last checked 13 Nov 2026
• USDA NIFA SBIR Phase I funding opportunity, last checked 13 Nov 2026
• Farmbrite pricing and about, last checked 13 Nov 2026
• CattleMax pricing and about, last checked 13 Nov 2026
• Bushel Farm pricing, last checked 13 Nov 2026
• Tend pricing, last checked 13 Nov 2026
• Harvest Profit pricing, last checked 13 Nov 2026
• Croptracker pricing, last checked 13 Nov 2026
• Figured pricing (US), last checked 13 Nov 2026
• AgriWebb pricing, last checked 13 Nov 2026
• AgFunderNews, Ag Connections founder interview, last checked 13 Nov 2026
• Spudman, Harvest Profit acquired by John Deere, last checked 13 Nov 2026